Socialist Studies 25 years
- This topic has 138 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Vin wrote:Bob Andrews wrote:With hindsight would you say Islington's support for the future capitalist government of Poland was a smart move?
No branch of the party ever supported any government, but socialist studies were well known for lying about the SPGB and you are following suit, now fuck off Troll
Two good points well made.
jondwhite wrote:With hindsight would you say Camden and North West London branches defiance of a democratic decision was a smart move? With hindsight would you say the statement of the Provisional Committee in 1911 that 'We deny altogether that a member of our Party is elected to Parliament for the purpose of taking party in any kind of legislation whether by voting for it or against it' was a smart move?Democratic decisions are there to be defied, undermined and frustrated.I'm baffled why you have quoted a statement from a 1911 Provisional Committee. What has that fantasy figure, " the Socialist member of Parliament" got to do
with anything?
Are you in favour of socialism?Should those in favour of socialism join a socialist party?Are you in favour of democracy as a means to achieving socialism?Are you of the view that socialists elected to legislatures ought not to vote on any legislation?
Bob Andrews wrote:jondwhite wrote:With hindsight would you say Camden and North West London branches defiance of a democratic decision was a smart move? With hindsight would you say the statement of the Provisional Committee in 1911 that 'We deny altogether that a member of our Party is elected to Parliament for the purpose of taking party in any kind of legislation whether by voting for it or against it' was a smart move?Democratic decisions are there to be defied, undermined and frustrated.I'm baffled why you have quoted a statement from a 1911 Provisional Committee. What has that fantasy figure, " the Socialist member of Parliament" got to do
Bob, I've printed off your contribution, so I could read it whilst on the toilet. It's in front of me now. Very soon it will be behind me.
Tim Kilgallon wrote:Bob, I've printed off your contribution, so I could read it whilst on the toilet. It's in front of me now. Very soon it will be behind me.I think Bob will understand. What, with him being an arsole.
Reminder: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
I would ask the Moderator to overlook Vincenzio's inflammatory remarks, abuse and insults. My masseuse is registered with Facebook and I asked her, out of morbid curiosity I suppose, to log into Vincenzio's Facebook page, and saw a photograph of him. I received the strong impression that he was wearing a wig. It is impossible to be angry for very long with a man who wears a wig.
Bob, your the first Gay Stalker I have ever had and I feel flattered but alas I lean the other way and have a full head of hair.As I understand it Bob, You have good reason to use a pseudonym but your secret is safe with me. However beware that dreaded and familiar knock at the door as you could end up back in the 'nick' for up to 10 yearshttps://www.theguardian.com/law/2017/jan/06/maximum-sentence-for-stalking-to-rise-to-10-years
Here you go Mr Andrew a video we made just for you. HAPPY STALKER All original https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVjDAijyxTY
Bob Andrews wrote:I would ask the Moderator to overlook Vincenzio's inflammatory remarks, abuse and insults. My masseuse is registered with Facebook and I asked her, out of morbid curiosity I suppose, to log into Vincenzio's Facebook page, and saw a photograph of him. I received the strong impression that he was wearing a wig. It is impossible to be angry for very long with a man who wears a wig.1st warning: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
Vin wrote:Bob, your the first Gay Stalker I have ever had and I feel flattered but alas I lean the other way and have a full head of hair.As I understand it Bob, You have good reason to use a pseudonym but your secret is safe with me. However beware that dreaded and familiar knock at the door as you could end up back in the 'nick' for up to 10 yearshttps://www.theguardian.com/law/2017/jan/06/maximum-sentence-for-stalking-to-rise-to-10-years1st warning: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
The only reason Bob Andrews has been issued a warning is so the Moderator can give me a warning. He will be wetting himself that I fell into the trap set for me. No matter which way the rules are manipulate or twisted the moderator is making the party look ridiculous.'Bob Andrews' is a Troll and uses a pseudonym, I am a member of the party defending myself against unmoderated TROLLS. To suspend me until the next conference while this fucking troll continues his attacks is not on. I hope the majority of members agree.Moreover, setting up and/or supporting trolls to settle old scores and to provoke a response is petty minded, childish and detrimental to the interests of the party. The member(s) responsible should hang their heads in shame.
Vin wrote:The only reason Bob Andrews has been issued a warning is so the Moderator can give me a warning. He will be wetting himself that I fell into the trap set for me. No matter which way the rules are manipulate or twisted the moderator is making the party look ridiculous.'Bob Andrews' is a Troll and uses a pseudonym, I am a member of the party defending myself against unmoderated TROLLS. To suspend me until the next conference while this fucking troll continues his attacks is not on. I hope the majority of members agree.Moreover, setting up and/or supporting trolls to settle old scores and to provoke a response is petty minded, childish and detrimental to the interests of the party. The member(s) responsible should hang their heads in shame.2nd warning: 14. Rule enforcement is the responsibility of the moderators, not of the contributors. If you believe a post or private message violates a rule, report it to the moderators. Do not take it upon yourself to chastise others for perceived violations of the rules. 15. Queries or appeals relating to particular moderation decisions should be sent directly to the moderators by private message. Do not post such messages to the forum. You must continue to abide by the moderators’ decisions pending the outcome of your appeal.
Dear Bob.There's something I think you should be aware of. It's funny isn't it? Even though these are only lines on a screen I'm actually talking to you. For this moment in time, I have your attention. I have your attention. Did you know that attention is power? Did that ever occur to you before? Probably not, because, let's be honest, you're not too bright. Kind of a dim bulb really. The Lord Mayor of Chumpsville. You know in your heart it's true, painful as it is to admit. No. Just kidding.I hope your feeling aren't hurt. I wouldn't have pulled your leg like that if I didn't think you could take it. I assume that a compagno with your high level of awareness will catch the ironic tone, the sarcastic humour. You're not some average ignoramous.I was lying. Those things I said about you before – all true. You are a supreme A-1 chucklehead. No. Just kidding. You are a warm, intelligent, decent guy. No you're not. You're a f**king imbecile.That's well known. No. Not true, not true. I don't know anything about you. Nothing. How could I? So don't get excited.But see how you let me jack you around emotionally? That's what happens when you give your attention to social media. You give it a lot of power. The power of social media…yep.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.