Russian Tensions

August 2024 Forums General discussion Russian Tensions

Tagged: 

Viewing 15 posts - 3,331 through 3,345 (of 5,217 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #236345
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    “My commonsense still leads me to believe it was unintentional and Zelinsky is merely trying to make as much political propaganda out of it as he can.”

    Quite so.

    #236346
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    #236342 REPLY

    Thomas_More
    Participant
    What would Zelensky have to gain by provoking a world war in which we all die, including him and his?

    ________________________________________________________________

    He is like Donald Trump who knows more than the Generals. The US Congress is already passing a bill which will provide more modern weapons to the Ukranian government before the new house of representative takes over

    #236347
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    “He is like Donald Trump who knows more than the Generals.”

    What do you mean? He knows it wouldn’t be WW3 if NATO came in, or he doesn’t care?

    Is he that stupid?

    #236352
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thomas

    I mean that TS knows more about military strategy than the general. I don’t think that NATO/USA, Ukraine, and Russia want to start another European war. Donald Trump was an expert on everything, and knowleagable on nothing and he said that he knew more than the generals and he did not even know how to handle a water pistol, and he ditched going to the vietnman war, there are bunch of keyboard warriors supporting wars, and national liberation, but they do not dare to go to any war

    #236354
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    I thought you were referring to Zelensky.

    #236357

    Justifications for destroying civilian infrastructure

    “he commented on the massive strike that the Russian Armed Forces carried out on Ukraine’s military command and control system and the related energy facilities on November 15, Peskov stressed that “the infrastructure facilities in question were directly or indirectly related to the military potential of Ukraine and the Ukrainian regime.”

    Of course, the just war fantasists would tell us that civilian infrastructure is outside war and a war crime to hit, but here the Russians can define it as a military target as indirectly related to military use (and doubtless NATO hit similar targets in Serbia all those years ago).

    But, note the headline “Special operation does not depend on weather conditions” it’s just a freak accident that “millions of Ukrainian citizens who remained without electric and thermal power supply on November 15 due to combat operations at a time when weather forecasts predicted lower air temperatures” and of course “Peskov said that this was a result of strikes on military infrastructure due to Kiev’s reluctance to conduct negotiations with Russia.” The cry of the bully through the ages.

    #236358
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Stephan articles are always on the spot The concept of false flag is a term widely used by the conspiracists theoriticians

    #236361

    My guess is Zelensky is playing to his home audience. Certainly, the Kremlin apologists are making hay over the fact that he won’t even entertain the possibility that it was a Ukrainian missile that came down.

    #236368
    TrueScotsman
    Blocked

    “People, like many who write rubbish on Quora, who are blase about nuclear exchanges, have really no realistic concept of the power of such weapons.”

    Well I’ll be darned, something we actually agree on.

    #236369
    TrueScotsman
    Blocked

    “here the Russians can define it as a military target as indirectly related to military use”

    The electrical grid is not indirectly related to military use it is directly related to military use. Ukraine’s trains run on electricity. To stop them transporting troops and war material around the country the Russians must cut the power.

    Will that make life difficult for the civilian population? Very much so but it will also shorten the war. A shorter war means fewer civilian casualties.

    Russia did not start this war Ukraine/NATOstan did. As with any side that starts a war all the horrors that result are their direct responsibility.

    #236370
    alanjjohnstone
    Keymaster

    “Russia did not start this war Ukraine/NATOstan did”

    When was Russia invaded? When was there any attack on Russia?

    Russia illegally under UN Charter intervened in another country’s civil war.

    Russia illegally annexed another nation’s territory, again in breach of the UN Charter.

    Even if the claim to be a pre-emptive war is accurate, it is still illegal under international law.

    #236371
    TrueScotsman
    Blocked

    “Stephan articles are always on the spot The concept of false flag is a term widely used by the conspiracists theoriticians”

    Right, false flags are like unicorns, they don’t exist. Moron Socialista, there are entire branches of the military that do nothing but manufacture lies and false flags. It’s called miltary deception. Back to kindergarten for you.

    https://usacac.army.mil/MDOSP

    #236373
    TrueScotsman
    Blocked

    “When was Russia invaded? When was there any attack on Russia?”

    When Donbass was recognised as independent it sought protection from Russia against Ukrainian agression.

    “Russia illegally under UN Charter intervened in another country’s civil war.”

    Scott Ritter has demonstrated that Russia’s actions were not illegal under international law.

    https://scheerpost.com/2022/04/01/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/

    #236374
    TrueScotsman
    Blocked

    “I thought you were referring to Zelensky.”

    Moron Socialista doesn’t know which day of the week it is let alone what he wrote 5 mins ago.. There’s clearly something not quite right going on upstairs. Don’t pay him any heed, I certainly don’t.

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 9 months ago by TrueScotsman.
    #236375
    TrueScotsman
    Blocked

    “There are several news reports reporting a weakening of support from China.”
    No doubt you’ll dismiss them as Guradian lies”

    Bojo’s Brain Fart you’re starting to learn. You know the only evidence you have is shite and yet, like a blow(hard)fly, you credulously cling to said shite anyways.

    “The information I have provided for you, regarding NPD (free of charge, I might add!) is based not on “pseudo science””

    Bojo’s Brain Fart is still playing dress ups as a Tween Vogue pseudo-scientist. How adorable. Now, run along and play child, the adults are talking.

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 9 months ago by TrueScotsman.
Viewing 15 posts - 3,331 through 3,345 (of 5,217 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.