Party Video 2016

[lindanesocialist]

jondwhite wrote:

Branded is not the equivalent of copyrighted. Everything newly created is copyrighted unless declared otherwise whether branded or unbranded.

Thankyou for that, cde, I think I have it sussed.

[lindanesocialist]

Young Master Smeet wrote:

ALB wrote:

I don't know if anyone else noticed it, but someone has posted in another section here that the BBC are charging £1000 for every minute of material from their archives:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/commissioning/tv/production/articles/archive-rights-clearancesAnd, more relevently:http://www.bbcmotiongallery.com/

It is important and urgent that – given this information – the EC disassociates itself from this website and the party's Youtube website. Or do you think differentlly Cde YMS?If not, why not? Would really appreciate a response from our legal Eagle 

[lindanesocialist]

 May I deal with the EC's criticism of the video: “The EC recognizes the efforts behind the video but is unwilling that it be adopted as an official party publication. Criticism of the video include its generally unprofessional and clichéd presentation such as that it is ineffective in getting the socialist case across. For example among other things the use of overly “dramatic” music, the appearance of cartoon capitalists, the emphasis on individual rather than a class approach.” Not to mention the demonisation of individual capitalists    

[lindanesocialist]

lindanesocialist wrote:

EC criticism of the video“ the appearance of cartoon capitalists, the emphasis on individual rather than a class approach"

 November Socialist Standard lol 

[Author]

Posts