Moderation Suggestions
- This topic has 293 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 6 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
moderator1 wrote:If by being less bias and discriminatory you mean I ignore that this post actually breaks Rule 6. Do not make repeated postings of the same or similar messages to the same thread, or to multiple threads or forums (‘cross-posting’). Do not make multiple postings within a thread that could be consolidated into a single post (‘serial posting’). Do not post an excessive number of threads, posts, or private messages within a limited period of time (‘flooding’).
As I have pointed out and explained to you over and over again. It does not braek any rules: It is not a repeated thread. I have also asked you to show me the thread it repeats but you can't because it doesn't exist.Can you publish the exchange of emails you have had with other IC members on this subject as would be fitting for a socialist organisation?
Vin wrote:moderator1 wrote:If by being less bias and discriminatory you mean I ignore that this post actually breaks Rule 6. Do not make repeated postings of the same or similar messages to the same thread, or to multiple threads or forums (‘cross-posting’). Do not make multiple postings within a thread that could be consolidated into a single post (‘serial posting’). Do not post an excessive number of threads, posts, or private messages within a limited period of time (‘flooding’).As I have pointed out and explained to you over and over again. It does not braek any rules: It is not a repeated thread. I have also asked you to show me the thread it repeats but you can't because it doesn't exist.Can you publish the exchange of emails you have had with other IC members on this subject as would be fitting for a socialist organisation?
"Its been explained to you in another thread why this open letter is allowed. Its also been explained to you in another thread why your posting of the open letter to Russell Brand was considered to be inappropriate for the forum." #13Its a repeated cross-posting and therefore in breach of Rule 6.
moderator1 wrote:Vin wrote:moderator1 wrote:If by being less bias and discriminatory you mean I ignore that this post actually breaks Rule 6. Do not make repeated postings of the same or similar messages to the same thread, or to multiple threads or forums (‘cross-posting’). Do not make multiple postings within a thread that could be consolidated into a single post (‘serial posting’). Do not post an excessive number of threads, posts, or private messages within a limited period of time (‘flooding’).As I have pointed out and explained to you over and over again. It does not braek any rules: It is not a repeated thread. I have also asked you to show me the thread it repeats but you can't because it doesn't exist.Can you publish the exchange of emails you have had with other IC members on this subject as would be fitting for a socialist organisation?
"Its been explained to you in another thread why this open letter is allowed. Its also been explained to you in another thread why your posting of the open letter to Russell Brand was considered to be inappropriate for the forum." #13Its a repeated cross-posting and therefore in breach of Rule 6.
As I keep saying 'Show me' Show me the Russel Brand letter on the forum. Why don't you admit to being wrong or making a mistake?
moderator1 wrote:Its also been explained to you in another thread why your posting of the open letter to Russell Brand was considered to be inappropriate for the forum." #13How will I know if my post is innappropriate in future? You will not decide until I have posted it! Why not stretch your imagination to a world where I can post anything as long as it hurts no one
Vin wrote:moderator1 wrote:Its also been explained to you in another thread why your posting of the open letter to Russell Brand was considered to be inappropriate for the forum." #13How will I know if my post is innappropriate in future? You will not decide until I have posted it! Why not stretch your imagination to a world where I can post anything as long as it hurts no one
It's not a question of hurting anyone but of understanding the rules. But if I suggest any more than that I know I'm in for a hammering with you probably accussing me of preaching or lecturing. Lol.Anyways basically the rules are there so the flow of the thread is not disrupted. Figure it out for yourself why it gets disrupted, but my advice is that before you click the save box read your message and ask yourself how will other posters react to how I've expressed this particular message? Don't do it once but several times and if any doubt is raised delete. You would be suprised how many messages I deliberately delete during the week.Paddy Shannon you may have noticed does not show his face here. Can I suggest you contact him and ask him why? I know what his advice is going to be but no harm in finding out for yourself. Ooops that's a breach of the rules.Before I forget it would be appreciated if you are keeping track and making a list of any suggestions you have for moderation. Anything which makes life easier all round would be very welcome. I agree the rules need reviewing but right now I just have not got the time to sacrifice or the same amount of energy I put into the Swansea report over two years ago. I've got older and slower. Damn another breach f**.See we all do it! Lovl
I dont miss Paddy Shannon, never heard of him but you could ask him why I left the forum or him being the great democrat I suspect he is he wouldnt listen to my point of view. By the the real reason why he left will have nothing to do with his excuses.
moderator1 wrote:Before I forget it would be appreciated if you are keeping track and making a list of any suggestions you have for moderation. Anything which makes life easier all round would be very welcome. I agree the rules need reviewingEasy. Stop wasting your time on the unnecessary moderation of me. You seem to have plenty of time for that. There is a lot worse than me on this forum of which you have every right to suspend _ permamently.
Vin wrote:moderator1 wrote:Before I forget it would be appreciated if you are keeping track and making a list of any suggestions you have for moderation. Anything which makes life easier all round would be very welcome. I agree the rules need reviewingEasy. Stop wasting your time on the unnecessary moderation of me. You seem to have plenty of time for that. There is a lot worse than me on this forum of which you have every right to suspend _ permamently.
Surely moderation of all posts is in the collective interest without exception? Your reasoning above is it seems is in contradiction to what you have posted elsewhere on this site.
Vin wrote:moderator1 wrote:Before I forget it would be appreciated if you are keeping track and making a list of any suggestions you have for moderation. Anything which makes life easier all round would be very welcome. I agree the rules need reviewingEasy. Stop wasting your time on the unnecessary moderation of me. You seem to have plenty of time for that. There is a lot worse than me on this forum of which you have every right to suspend _ permamently.
Come on Vin.I think it's a bit un-comradely to call for others to be banned from this forum. If you recall there are Party members who didn't want you back in the SPGB and on the forum, citing disruption as the reason. I would have thought you would rise above their level after being on the receiving end yourself.
I was not disruptive. The EC members that claimed I was were party to a dispute with me so had an axe to grind.My point didn't really come across in my last post – I meant compared to me there are some that should be took out and shot. Hyperbole to make a point. I am a well behaved pussy compared to some is what I mean. There are some who are plain nasty and sarcastic, don't have an argument so insult people or take the piss.
Not sure who your'e referring to, JC is no longer in the SPGB.I know there were axes to grind, I was keeping an eye on things. But my point still stands, if suspensions are warranted, Mod1 will swing into action. Remember you aint the only one on the receiving end of a suspension in recent months.The problem with going on at the moderator to leave you alone is it confuses the situation, that expands becoming an issue of itself, taking center stage and making it harder to ascertain if you are being unfairly treated.Just a bit of friendly advice.
I wanted to stay out of this but the recent post by mod1 has forced my hand! I would suggest that before comrades make up their minds about the rights and wrongs here, they look at the posts made by "comrades" on spintcom and spopen, at the time, that villified 2 "ex" members who, by not then, being in the Party, had no redress from the vile, abusive things said, of them.Members will have to address their own sense of conscience, to decide if they were culpable. Or, we could just say, lets just be fucking "adults" and moreover treat posts on the Forum with our supposed intelligence, not be so fucking sensitive, give a bit of fucking leeway and get on with what we are here for, in the first instance, thats "right", advocating and working for SOCIALISM.No…. I'm not drunk, nor drugged up, just cheesed of, that a Party that prides itself on the its case "against" Capitalism and "for" Socialism, and the cogency of and for the same, cannot get itself sorted to allow free and open discussion on its Forum!!!
What's all this shouting? We'll have no trouble here!! We aren't a revolutionary movement, Tubbs! It's just a local shop for local people! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOtpgz4L5d8
Reminder: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
Lol
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.