Evil
- This topic has 93 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Mod1, 2 of my posts have been flagged for no reason. Do you intend to post a reminder. Or do you believe there were good reasons for them to be flagged?Rule 11You continue with your uneven hand where I am concerned
Vin wrote:Mod1, 2 of my posts have been flagged for no reason. Do you intend to post a reminder. Or do you believe there were good reasons for them to be flagged?Rule 11You continue with your uneven hand where I am concernedThere is always a reason for flagging. However, once a post is flagged I have to decide what action if any needs to be taken. Usually, I just delete the flagging and take no action, unless its obvious that the flagging function is getting abused on a regular basis. Then I'll post a reminder.Currently, I have a backlog on flaggings, which require my attention. However, there are no posts currently which require any action other than reminders. Which I'll post later today when I make a start on the backlog. It seems the new protocol and process has made life far more relaxing.
moderator1 wrote:There is always a reason for flagging.That is not what you have said in the past 11. Do not abuse the report function. Only highlight posts that genuinely require moderator attention.
Reminder: 11. Do not abuse the report function. Only highlight posts that genuinely require moderator attention.
Mod1 can you explain why you have removed my post when there is so much crap and abuse you could be removing?
moderator1 wrote: There is always a reason for flagging. That is not what you have said in the past 11. Do not abuse the report function. Only highlight posts that genuinely require moderator attention.[/quote]
Perhaps the amount of time spent on "policing" this site is the reason the Internet Committee didn't have time to write even a very brief report on their activities to the democratic decision making body that is the SPGB Annual Conference?
Tim Kilgallon wrote:Perhaps the amount of time spent on "policing" this site is the reason the Internet Committee didn't have time to write even a very brief report on their activities to the democratic decision making body that is the SPGB Annual Conference?Well perhaps they should spend less time 'policing' me. And for no reason whatsoever. They could try fucking off and leaving me to get on with itBy the way Tim why hasn't your post been sent to 'off topic'? AS 100s of LBird's should have been?
Reminder: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.14. Rule enforcement is the responsibility of the moderators, not of the contributors. If you believe a post or private message violates a rule, report it to the moderators. Do not take it upon yourself to chastise others for perceived violations of the rules.
Can I say to the moderator apologies if this is off topic. Please move it if we have a designated thread for it. I only drop in every couple of days."Perhaps the amount of time spent on "policing" this site is the reason the Internet Committee didn't have time to write even a very brief report on their activities to the democratic decision making body that is the SPGB Annual Conference?"Comrade, The internet committee has submitted their report, albeit too late for the printing up dead- line. 'Moderating' lists and this forum, is but one small part of the work done. You will see some evidence of this later this year, when the updated site is completed.Any 'policing' as you put it, is in a defensive mode, preventing and thwarting hack attacks, maintaining our online presence and so on.
Matt a lot of energy is wasted and angst caused by over policing me. I did no more than any other member and was repeatedly expelled. Which is hardly 'defensive' This attitude towards me continues . (See twitter account saga) I believe it is because the Internet Committee will not move on – and still wont – as far as I am concerned. I am still someone to be monitored. I am not a second class member but I am treated as suchMod and admin 'talk' to all members but when it comes to me there are simple 'quotes' from the rule book, making me feel really at home.I too apologise for going off topic.
Matt, are you a member of the IC? It is important because some members have more than one IDs or accounts which contravenes rule 8such as 'admin' and 'mod1'
Vin wrote:Matt, are you a member of the IC? It is important because some members have more than one IDs or accounts which contravenes rule 8such as 'admin' and 'mod1'1st warning: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
Hello modcan you explain to members and sympathisers who may be thinking of joining why I am the only one to receive a warning. What have I done differently? As far as forum rules are concerned.?As a socialist who believes in open and free discussion I am sure you will explainDo we have a multi tier member system? Or does our rule book ensure we all have the same rights
Vin wrote:Hello modcan you explain to members and sympathisers who may be thinking of joining why I am the only one to receive a warning. What have I done differently? As far as forum rules are concerned.?As a socialist who believes in open and free discussion I am sure you will explainDo we have a multi tier member system? Or does our rule book ensure we all have the same rightsSure I'll explain, but not on this thread. Please duplicate and place it on the Moderators suggestion thread.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.