Diversity is a codeword for White genocide
- This topic has 11 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 12 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
As you say, another nutter. and like all racists (or is it racialists?) he gets his facts wrong. Japan does have migrants from other countries, especially Korea. But I suppose he could come back and say that the old Apartheid regime in South Africa used to classify Japanese as "Whites".
My race, is the human race. However I will say I was pretty good at the 100 meters sprint when I was a gangly teenager at school.
But then no-one changes there mind as the result of a few forum posts. I think we'll need to get the Debunking Handbook out for this one!
ALB wrote:As you say, another nutter. and like all racists (or is it racialists?) he gets his facts wrong. Japan does have migrants from other countries, especially Korea. But I suppose he could come back and say that the old Apartheid regime in South Africa used to classify Japanese as "Whites".Whilst classifying the wealthy Japanese as 'honorary whites', apartheid South Africa also used to classify the poorer Chinese as non-white. This was also the case for Koreans and Taiwanese until trade pacts made them think twice.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honorary_whites
Those from Africa send them back to Africa….ooops, that's all homo sapians in the world…Prove you are a neanderthal…and then you can stay…(but i don't want to upset any neaderthals by implying the knuckle-dragging original poster is one…who will no doubt retort that he has some sort of PhD, which only goes to prove you don't need to be intelligent to be clever)Some people you simply don't argue with if you want to keep your sanity…you walk away, after having expressed an opinion on theirs.
Something about the last line in the opening post suggests to me that this is a statement only, that there will be no backing up of the position. "Share it now. Like it while you're at it."It's probably been posted on a number of political forum sites, if it resonates with some, as no doubt it will, they may be inclined to share it and so it has achieved its intention.As Jondwhite pointed out, the supposed rigid lines of racist ideology are often twisted out of shape to accommodate the acquisition of profit. Something the adherents of racist ideology so often fail to grasp.
I like yours much better Jon. A few others are 'workers of the world, unite!' and 'abolition of the wages system!'.This text – or something like it – has been floating around for a while. Pretty sure it's been posted to RevLeft a couple of times in the last 3 years or so.
windingriver wrote:ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!Thinking about this some more, I noticed two big omissions and wondered about why the OP didn't declaim AMERICA FOR THE AMERICANS, EUROPE FOR THE EUROPEANS. Who would that mean to say AMERICA FOR THE AMERICANS anyway? Stranger still when you consider these are two of the more historically successful regions but also the least ethnically homogenous. Perhaps 'Diversity' is a code word for success rather than 'white genocide'.
Interesting article here by Danny Dorling on the decline of racist attitudes:http://www.dannydorling.org/wp-content/files/dannydorling_publication_id4238.pdfHistory is on our side on this one.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.