Digital Technology and Socialism
- This topic has 9 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 8 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
By coincidence, following on from a discussion here about the uses of digitable technology to make books, paintngs and other works of art much more widely available, the Louvre in Paris has just announced that it is making its entire collection available online and for free. I think we can see this, can’t we, as an anticipation of the what can be done on a much wider scale in socialism. Of course this doesn’t preclude looking at the original or the publication of exact copies of books and paintings for people to handle.
Here’s the news item:
That old press cutting (found no doubt by using digital technology) shows precisely why the possibility taken up by the Louvre will never be fully used under capitalism and won’t be able to be till we get socialism when, of course, there will no longer be ownership rights over books and other works of art.
Incidentally, nobody here (and as far as I know noboy anywhere) has suggested that physical books should disappear. I don’t think that’s going to happen even under capitalism. They talk of paperless offices but that will be the case in socialism too, even if for a different reason — most of the paperwork today has to do with money in one way or another and that won’t exist.
Forum rules
Your use of the forums indicates your agreement to abide by these rules, to abide by the decisions of the moderators in interpreting and enforcing these rules.
1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
2. The forums proper are intended for public discussion. Personal messages between participants should be sent via private message or by e-mail.
3. Do not use the forums to send spam, advertisements, charitable appeals, solicitations, or other messages primarily intended to promote a particular product, service, campaign, website, organisation, venture, or event, unless it is relevant to the SPGB or its companion parties, without first obtaining permission from the moderators.
4. Do not use the forum to send any material that you know or should know would expose the SPGB to criminal or civil liability. This includes but is not limited to material which constitutes libel, harassment, or violation of copyright. You may, of course, quote portions of third-party publications for ‘fair dealing’ purposes such as criticism or review.
5. Do not use the forum to send any material or links to material that you know or should know contains or exposes readers to malware, computer viruses, trojans, and so forth.
6. Do not make repeated postings of the same or similar messages to the same thread, or to multiple threads or forums (‘cross-posting’). Do not make multiple postings within a thread that could be consolidated into a single post (‘serial posting’). Do not post an excessive number of threads, posts, or private messages within a limited period of time (‘flooding’).
7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
8. Do not register or operate more than one account without first obtaining permission from the moderators. Do not share your password with others or allow anyone else to use your account. Do not use your account to post messages on behalf of any suspended user, without prior permission from the moderators.
9. Do not vandalise or tamper with the forums in order to deface them, to impersonate or deny access to others, or to evade the enforcement of these rules.
10. You retain the copyright to the original material you post. By posting on these forums you grant the SPGB and its successors and assigns a non-exclusive irrevocable right to publish your posting in any manner it or they see fit without notice or compensation to you.
11. Do not abuse the report function. Only highlight posts that genuinely require moderator attention.
12. Moderators may move, remove, or lock any threads or posts which they deem to be off-topic or in violation of the rules. Because posts and threads can be deleted without advance notice, it is your responsibility to make copies of threads and posts which are important to you.
13. Moderators may temporarily or permanently suspend posting and private messaging privileges for posters they deem to be in violation of the rules.
14. Rule enforcement is the responsibility of the moderators, not of the contributors. If you believe a post or private message violates a rule, report it to the moderators. Do not take it upon yourself to chastise others for perceived violations of the rules.
15. Queries or appeals relating to particular moderation decisions should be sent directly to the moderators by private message. Do not post such messages to the forum. You must continue to abide by the moderators’ decisions pending the outcome of your appeal.
Contact Forum adminThomas Moore may have been slightly annoying but when there’s only four people posting to a forum do we really have to worry about derailment? Not that I particularly care, this is really just a form of procrastination for me.
The thread is as stated,DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIALISM.
12. Moderators may move, remove, or lock any threads or posts which they deem to be off-topic or in violation of the rules. Because posts and threads can be deleted without advance notice, it is your responsibility to make copies of threads and posts which are important to you.
There is a Topic for concerns.
Website / Technical
Feedback and announcements concerning day to day running and technical aspects of this website.Also a procedure.
15. Queries or appeals relating to particular moderation decisions should be sent directly to the moderators by private message. Do not post such messages to the forum. You must continue to abide by the moderators’ decisions pending the outcome of your appeal.
Just idle musing, but if socialism had been established before the digital age happened, I wonder if it would ever have come about? After all it’s almost totally a response to the commercial demands of advanced capitalism. Though it would have come in useful for say large scale referendums.
“Thomas Moore may have been slightly annoying but when there’s only four people posting to a forum do we really have to worry about derailment?”
I didn’t find TM the slightest bit annoying and am very sorry that he seems to have left/been driven from (?) this forum as apparently has P.Abelard (TM‘s alto-ego by any chance). Now we are left once again with “four people posting” including one clearly unable to resist doing so on each and every conceivable topic.
On other fora of which I’m a member, individuals are restricted to the number of messages they can post in a given time period.
“including one clearly unable to resist doing so on each and every conceivable topic. On other fora of which I’m a member, individuals are restricted to the number of messages they can post in a given time period.”
If this is in reference to myself (apologies if it is not), it is compensation for the majority of Party members including office holders who distain from posting on the forum for whatever reason they may hold.
It is not a particularly well visited popular website compared with many others but for those who do drop by, it should have amply coverage to retain their interest and attention.
I view this forum as an alternative news outlet for the members use of on their own social media. For the SOYMB blog i do an extensive survey of websites and inevitably come across items of interest.
I also seek to update older posts when more recent information very often contrary to my own personal positions which i still post here so that the forum looks and feels contemporary and relevant to current affairs.
Another purpose of the forum is to encourage debate and discussion among members and sometimes posts should be purposefully provocative.
An older now redundant discussion list we once hosted did have posting limits for individuals. I felt it interrupted the exchanges and interactions. If the frequency of my contributions annoy, they are very free not to click on to them or read them.
I found this article and the blokes research field interesting.
https://aeon.co/essays/does-consciousness-come-from-the-brains-electromagnetic-field?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.