Lost in the ozone again

I hope we do see reduced use of fossil fuels.  A case can be made against fossil fuels and for renewable energy and broader sustainability that is completely independent of the global warming thesis.  Can capitalism achieve sustainability?  I doubt it, but I don't see any difference in the underlying mentality of socialists.  You believe in overcoming Nature, when in my view the mindset should be to live within and according to Nature.  In short, I reject overcoming externalities in favour of self-overcoming.  I suspect your implicit belief in anthropomorphising Nature arises because you know deep down that a Natural Order, even of an anarchistic kind (I believe a true Natural Order would be anarchistic), is inherently a 'fascist' and 'racist' view, as you would have it.  Regarding the subject of political action on the environment, the reason unified and (as it seemed at the time) effective action could be taken against CFCs was because the underlying science was widely accepted as sound – the tiny number of skeptics, whether they were right or not, were effectively marginalised – and there must have been economic incentives that allowed profitable action to be taken.  The same is not the case for global warming: the underlying science looks unsound, has been shown to be fraudulent in some crucial respects, is not agreed on in all quarters, and is questioned, challenged or even opposed by many able scientists who offer cogent science against it or undermining it; furthermore, in 'developing' countries like China, there are powerful economic interests against taking action.