Republic vs democracy vs anarchy

I think, CP, that you have visited the forum enough to understand that we have no sympathy with a type of government ruling over us and that we seek the end of the State.The nature of the administration and management of society is up for speculation and debate and even SPGB members differ on the priority and emphasis of the possible organisation bodies. The world is a big diverse place and many peoples have their own customs and traditions. It will also depend on at what level we are discussing. Locally maybe it will be the town-hall meetings as proposed by Bookchin, similar general assemblies, advocated by some anarchists. But there will be an evolution of the present manner of reflecting peoples wishes, i don't envisage local councils being discarded right away, although they may empower parish councils more to be more responsive. But a delegated form of decision -making will be necessary at a global level. However, we do have the influence of the internet, computer and phones, that can now be applied imaginatively. Check out whats called collaborative filtering…an answer to those who say we be spending an inordinate time at meetings . I think it will be horses for courses, or as other say, different strokes for different folks, maybe a mixture and balance of economic democracy and civic democracy. But if i am pushed i find nothing too wrong about Lincoln's dictum…"government of the people, for the people, by the people"..as a general statement of principle. 

 You refer to everyone' rights pertaining to property.  It is important to understand what is meant by "property".  In its economic sense the term refers to "means of production".  It does not mean possessions In a socialist society there is common ownership of the means of production from which it axiomatically follows that there is no more economic exchange or exchange-related institutions such as wage labour, profits, markets , banks, tax departments  and so on. Logically, the "rights"  that  arise out of common ownership of the means of production are those of full and unrestricted free access to the products of industry.  The flip side of the coin of free access , is volunteer labour and the sense of obligation that goes with to contribute to society  according to your abilities.. Common ownership  however does not extend to possessions.  I have no more desire to share your toothbrush than you have, mine.

Republic vs Democracy is a nonsense created by the so called founders of the US ( like Bolivar, Sucres, San Martin, Duarte, Hidalgo,  etc, etc.)which were a bunch of landowners, land robbers,  indians killers, slave drivers, slave owners, opium traffickers,   and racist peoples, and many peoples without knowing the real history are always repeating the same shit.Most do not know what a  republic is, or what a democracy is, and whatever, or whoever do not support the same stupidity is called banana republic, without known where the expressios came from. All capitalists countries are republic including the smallest one that exists over the face of the earth, and in all of them the rich have more rights than the workers or the poor peoples, and all are divided in rich and poor, and that is call democracy. The more powerfull ones want to give lectures of democracy to others using warplanes, gunboat diplomacy, and they are presided by war criminals, and gangsters wearing a suit and a tieThe USA is a republic like any other Republic based on a bourgoise democracy, labor exploitation, and a ruling class that extracts profits from the sweat of the workers, and with millions of workers like any other country where the majority of the workers are supporting their own ruling elite, their own exploiterss,  with nationalists point of view, and workers are rejecting others workers without knowing the real socio-economical reasonsAnarchism is a conception that millions of peoples do not know the real meaning of the expression, and the rulers have  told them that it is a chaos, and without rules, and it just a lie, it is the absence of state and oppression. The first one that created chaos around the world is the capitalist state, and the first terrorist around the world is the US ruling class,a nd they have a long history of making alliances with terrorists, thieves, gangsters,  and criminals, one gangster replace another gangster by votesIn this forum we have said millions of times ( we have written thousands of articles )  that we do not support any type of goverment, any type of republic, we do not support any type of leaders, we do not support the concept of nation,  and we do not support the so called demcoracy of the rich, and we support a society without state, we do not support anby party of poverty, we support a world society without leaders, without wars, without a rat poison known as nationalism.What nation can have a human being that is living from a salary, and does not even have enough money to pay the rent, or is living in the streets begging for money, what country or republic can have a person that go to another country to kill another human being and does not have  the courage,or the balls  to say NO. I am not going to kill anybody ?  Simple and easy. There is not need to go to the London or New York library to know that. We just need a bath of social reality, or buy new binoculars. My grandfather knew all that,  and he cleaned his ass with a passport in front of an ambassador

It is very funny to listen to some so  called Congressmen or lawmen saying that the Mexican workers are criminals. What about all the legalized thieves that have stolen the sweat from the Mexican workers inside and outside the USA? Those have been blessed by God and the law, those have the rights to exploits others human beings In the legal system it is known as robbery, in the legal system it is a legalized crime. What about all the land robbers that went all the way down to Mexico DF and signed the Guadalupe-Hidalgo treaty ? Those thieves returned possessing   large extension of landsin many countries a Criminal is a person who has stolen the property of somebody else, or have killed another human being, but a person violating a traffic law is not a criminal, a person that has been forced to emigrate to another country due to the conditions created by a bunch of thieves, and assasin in others countries, is not a criminal. The law and the constitution is created to serve the rich peoples.In the name of the Law many countries have been destroyed with bombs and the peoples from those countries have been forced to emigrate, and now those peoples are being rejected after they created those conditions, and they have been labelled as criminals