Best academic ‘socialist’ journal

August 2024 Forums General discussion Best academic ‘socialist’ journal

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #85288
    jondwhite
    Participant

    What's the best academic-style 'socialist' journal to read?

    #124525
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    jondwhite wrote:
    What's the best academic-style 'socialist' journal to read?

    Socialist Standard which is published by The Socialist Party of Great Britain

    #124526
    jondwhite
    Participant

    Cheers, but I'm talking more scholarly, e.g. more about this sort of thinghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_journalAnyone familiar with Capital&Class, Rethinking Marxism or Historical Materialism?

    #124527
    robbo203
    Participant
    jondwhite wrote:
    Cheers, but I'm talking more scholarly, e.g. more about this sort of thinghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_journalAnyone familiar with Capital&Class, Rethinking Marxism or Historical Materialism?

     I have a few copies of Capital & Class somewhere.  Not too bad.  Although the problem with many lefty "academic" journals is 1) they come across as somewhat pretentious and snobby in the language they employ and 2) they dont really have much if any commitment to the goal of a genuine socialist society.  Its often just lip service with them, a clothes horse onto which they can hang their academic credentials I wouldnt class the Socialist Standard as an "academic journal" which is not to denigrate the important work that it does.  However, I do think there is an urgent need for a journal of some kind that looks into issues relevant to the movement in much more systematic and detailed way Whatever happened to the "World Socialist"?  Is it it not high time it was revived?

    #124528
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The' World Socialist'  claimed the proto-fascist D H Lawrence as a socialist. I don't think it needs reviving.

    #124529
    jondwhite
    Participant

    Which issue?

    #124530
    robbo203
    Participant
    Bob Andrews wrote:
    The' World Socialist'  claimed the proto-fascist D H Lawrence as a socialist. I don't think it needs reviving.

     Here is the article in question – judge for yourself. And you are dead wrong.  The article said quite explicitly "He was not a socialist and did not profess to be one" From the Winter 1985-6 issue of the World Socialist D. H. Lawrence and the abolition of money The novelist and poet, D. H. Lawrence, who died in 1930, was born one hundred years ago, on 11 September, 1885. He was not a socialist and did not profess to be one, but there can be no doubt that he possessed some excellent ideas about what was wrong with the money-wages-profit system and what sort of society would be fitter for humans to live in. Certain rather foolish literary gentlemen and superficial Leftists have described Lawrence as a fascist. There is no evidence to support this claim, and we would argue that it is a label mainly put about by Stalinists who resented Lawrence for having been a non-conservative who was totally opposed to the state-capitalist dictatorship of the Russian Empire. In the 1930s to have taken up such a position, even if you were in favour of social transformation, meant that the so-called Communists would call you a fascist in the hope of discrediting you. In the case of D. H. Lawrence, who wrote explicitly about why he opposed fascism, the label struck and the smear has no doubt led many people to dismiss the social and political context of his poetry. To do so is to dismiss some of the most forcefully revolutionary poems ever written in English, a selection of which we publish below. They were written in 1929 and are taken from the second volume of Lawrence's selected poems published by Heinemann (the book is deceptively called Pansies, but we can assure you that it is not about flowers). Why did Lawrence take up some of the ideas expressed in these poems? Reading them, one might think that he was acquainted with the Socialist Party of Great Britain, but there is no evidence to show that he was. More likely, Lawrence picked up the socialist content of his thinking as a result of visiting the home of his girlfriend until 1912, Louise Burrows, whose father was a committed socialist who possessed the socialist writings of William Morris and spent his time talking with Lawrence about the case for socialism whenever the young writer visited his house. The connection between William Morris and D. H. Lawrence is rarely made, and shallow critics would have it that the former was a romantic revolutionary while the latter was a fascistic reactionary (both utterly mistaken observations): in fact, it will be seen from the poems published here that Lawrence too shared a passion to change the insane society of capitalism, and that, if anything, his poetry was more expressive in its simplicity. Moreover, it is known that he had read Morris' News From Nowhere, and was inspired by its depiction of a socialist society.    The poems can be accessed here  http://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com.es/2013/12/d-h-lawrence-and-abolition-of-money.html

    #124531
    robbo203
    Participant
    Bob Andrews wrote:
    The' World Socialist'  claimed the proto-fascist D H Lawrence as a socialist. I don't think it needs reviving.

    Even if this were true and I have already shoen this to be completely false, how is this an argument against reviving such a journal?  It strikes me that a movement called the World Socialist Movement needs a journal called the World Socialist or some such – no? In any event, my main point stands – there is a pressing need for a journal which has a more theoretical or, if you prefer, academic approach than the Socialist Standard which quite rightly focusses on more topical issues, 

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.