I'm not sure that "Freedom" could have claimed to have been "the longest surviving 'libertarian socialist' journal". It wouldn't have described itself as such as it catered for all brands of anarchism (except anarcho-capitalism) including individualist anarchists who regarded socialism as an extension of "the tyranny of the majority" they saw democracy as being.Second, it ceased publication between 1932 and 1945. It was never clear either who owned and controlled it, but it was something more like the tyranny of the minority, a precaution against being taken over by a group of organised anarchists (if that's not a contradiction).I used to subscribe to it too a long time ago and I suppose it is sort of sad to see it go under. In the 40s, 50s and 60s it expressed what the nebulous concept of anarchism meant at that time in this country.