Is this forum under the democratic control of the socialist party members

"There's a worse fate than that TOGW. You could find people ignoring your posts all together."Indeed so! My transgressions were apparently to give readers the respect they are due with a full reply albeit lengthy and then also on another occasion to respond to what i considered erroneous interpretations of my post by yourself which you obviously decided did not deserve an answer. (http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/general-discussion/occupy-movement?page=29)

Alan!My apologies for letting you go without a reply (and I'm not certain whether this is the right thread in which to do it).First I'm not the only one to comment on the length of this discussion. Here is SussexSocialist in the 'Occupy' thread #285

 Second (and  far more importantly) is your seeming suggestion that we undertake some boring from within. I accept your assurance that this is not your view but I think I might be excused if I took it to be so (emphasis added by me in each case): For example your post # 290http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/general-discussion/occupy-movement?page=28

And again in your post #287:

Your post # 286:

 See what I mean? 

In regard to Occupy Movement i did not regard it as a monolithic organisation, more an umbrella group, such as we would describe the Trade Union Movement to be . Within such an organisational structure as Occupy many schools of thought existed. Some we were sympathetic towards, some we disagreed with and opposed. We would have constituted only one independent element. I simply wanted to emphasise that we as part of the working class, albeit already organised and claiming to have acquired a degree of class and socialist consciousness, which endows us with an educational role, are legitimate part of the class struggle and should not be excluded from participation in it, either by others who may disagree with our views because we are a clearly a political party or by those members of the party who wish a self-imposed non-involvement because of the "hostility" clause. The fight against capitalism is a priority for our class. We cannot be outside that process so i concentrated advocating being within it, arguing our case openly with no ulterior motive of imposing our ideas. That is what separates us from the Leninist vanguard who do disguise their agenda and camoflage their manipulation of workers organisations. The SPGB has always claimed to be an educational propagandist party and the fact that we assume the mantle of teacher does not turn us into leaders. "Educate. Agitate. Organise" Anyways, i'm glad you now understand that "boring from within" was not what i was calling for but engaging in the exchange of ideas as class members to others of our class.