Against Martovism

Actually the link led me to Chomsky and sport and how it is relevant to what was being discussed on another thread. How do we engage with people. As Chomsky  points out those “common folk” with little interest in politics demonstrate astounding knowledge about sport. “There are also experts about football, but these people don’t defer to them. The people who call in talk with complete confidence. They don’t care if they disagree with the coach or whoever the local expert is. They have their own opinion and they conduct intelligent discussions. I think it’s an interesting phenomenon…The gas station attendant who wants to use his mind isn’t going to waste his time on international affairs, because that’s useless; he can’t do anything about it anyhow, and he might learn unpleasant things and even get into trouble. So he might as well do it where it’s fun, and not threatening — professional football or basketball or something like that. But the skills are being used and the understanding is there and the intelligence is there.” When i went to demonstrations on the Saturdays, i overhear someone commending the numbers attending and then witness 10-fold the crowd going to the local football game with more colour, more enthusiasm,  more joy and more committment than any of the demonstrators had been showing for whatever issue was being protested. This year i think the biggest march in Scotland has been to the SFA HQ  to complain about sanctions against Rangers (RIP). I am not suggesting we leaflet stadiums, the right-wing in the long-run i don’t think met with too much success doing that, and the left even less so.  But simply saying, as Chomsky is, that we should not give up hope of our political explanations being understood by the working class because it is too complicated, too theoretical and abstract. Just visit the local bookie and see how the punters can relate to you how a horse performs on different courses and in heavy or soft going to realise how patronising it is to claim that the working class are not intelligent enough to understand socialism – All the SPGB  has to do is to show the relevancy and show that change is indeed possible and revolution a realistic prospect. Was it for that reason that the myth of the general strike was created by syndicalists, i have a vague recall that is what Sorel’s Reflections on Violence was all about. Who can honestly say politics is any longer fun to participate in. The days of May-day rallies, the miners galas, elections with posters in the windows and bunting in the streets, open air meetings with police joining in the laughter at the heckling instead of now dragging the offenders off for “behaviour likely to lead to a breach of the peace” have all gone. Dreary politicos with unintelligible talk of “Martovism” and “liquidationists” flog their humourless journals. As some singer said sometime ago  …”where have all the protest songs gone?”…Even we discussed revolutionary songs a few weeks ago and only came up with options of 19th C dirges ….and the miners strikers returned to their football supporters chants from the terracing and the stands to sing on the picket lines.  Sorry to have deflected the post from Martov. It may be just a story but the Daily Worker as it was at the time had the highest circulation when they had an excellent racing tipster. Here in Scotland both Robin Cook and Alex Salmond had columns in the sports pages doing racing tips but i don’t think it ever influenced how people voted for them. Treat this contribution as a Sunday morning radio call-in on talk radio…grumpy and hung-over

 A crossword and i have suggested this before.http://archive.tribunemagazine.co.uk/article/26th-december-1941/22/socialist-crossword Since there are concerns from Paddy about members only reading the Standard online, wouldn’t a crossword help to ensure they would buy it to do the crossword and then buy the following months issue to get the answers! And educational, too”5 across clue could be “You get your money back if you don’t get this (9) “- answer socialism, – and the clue for 10 down – “Exact same as 5 across (9) – answer communism ” Full marks if you get the answer to this, Charlie?(4) ….. Another, Charlie, who published a lot (4)…..A right lazy sod this son-in-law turned out to be  (4,….Should council workers we be reading this communist on Shrove Tuesday (5,9)…. A prize of a free 6 – month subscription to one reader who send in correct answers that is picked out  ……just doubling  up, our existing free offer but  we could be generous and make it one year…no jokes about that being the 2nd place prize, please    (but with of course the usual small print exclusion cluse …”members and their family are excluded from the prizes”, i know some real mean skinflints in the party !!) Trial it for the December issue,  “Christmas Crossword” and give the winner a free subscription for 2013. The anarchist Black Flag had a very popular quiz that resulted in a pamphlet of its own being produced. Our own Xmas/New Year online quiz devised by Paul Bennet is always popular. Twist his arm to do a monthly one. 60 questions for 12 issues.   

I thought it was April 1st all over.

 It’s probably best seen as collateral damage in the light of the CPGB’s decline and eventual implosion. Despite the latter, (with all its faction fighting), the magazine had become a rare success, and was a widely available glossy publication. I remember buying it in WH Smiths. (And the RCP’s ‘Living Marxism’, too).‘Marxism Today’ seemed to outstrip the Party itself. In his book on the CPGB, ‘The Good Old Cause’, Willie Thompson says “By the mid-1980s most of its readers were outside the CP; by the time of the first formal readership survey, overwhelmingly so. (So were most of its contributors).”It had become the vehicle of the Eurocommunist faction which somehow found itself dominating the CPGB, much to the disgust of the Morning Star lot, and various other factions. The Eurocommunists controlled the magazine, and were responsible for the ‘New Times Manifesto’, which firmly pointed the CPGB away from its old Labourist traditions. Thompson says – “It had been decided in the Spring of 1991 that Marxism Today would cease publication at the end of the year” – to be replaced by a new journal for the post-CPGB ‘Democratic Left’.Apparently, for all its relatively wide readership and visibility, it wasn’t a profitable magazine; it needed an annual subsidy of around £50,000.